The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has explained why it has not yet arrested Blessing CEO, the controversial relationship expert accused of misleading the public with false cancer claims and fundraising. Despite widespread outrage on social media, the anti-graft agency stated it has not received a formal petition against her, which is a necessary step before any investigation can begin. Blessing CEO had claimed last month she was diagnosed with stage four breast cancer and appealed for financial support from Nigerians. However, she later clarified that she does not have stage four cancer and is still awaiting further medical tests, adding that she has not started chemotherapy.
She also corrected the widely reported figure of ₦100 million, insisting she received only ₦13 million from the public. This clarification came amid growing suspicion and public anger over the authenticity of her claims. Many Nigerians took to social media to demand action from the EFCC, accusing Blessing CEO of fraud. The EFCC, however, emphasized that it cannot act solely on public outcry or social media trends without a credible and formal complaint.
A source within the EFCC told The Cable that the commission requires a legitimate complainant to initiate any probe. “Everybody is saying EFCC should arrest Blessing CEO. But nobody has placed a petition before the EFCC CEO,” the source said. The agency stressed that as an anti-corruption body, it must operate within legal frameworks and cannot pursue cases based on public agitation alone. The source further questioned who would serve as a witness if the matter were to go to court, highlighting the importance of a formal petition.
The EFCC official urged anyone with evidence—such as donation receipts or records of financial transactions—to come forward. “Everybody knows that if somebody obtains anything by false pretence, they are liable to EFCC investigation if it can be established,” the source added. The commission is open to receiving evidence that could substantiate claims of fraud or misappropriation of funds. Until then, no legal action can be taken.
This development underscores the legal procedures the EFCC must follow, even in high-profile cases. While public sentiment is strong, the agency must rely on formal complaints and verifiable evidence to proceed. The case remains under public scrutiny, and the EFCC’s stance may influence how future cases of online fundraising fraud are handled in Nigeria.
Leave a Comment